In this comparison, we compare two popular microphones in the podcasting and streaming world: the Audio-Technica AT2040 and the Maono PD100. Whether you’re a budding podcaster, a seasoned live streamer, or just curious about audio gear, this guide is for you!

Audio Technica AT2040 Microphone Overview

The Audio-Technica AT2040 Hypercardioid Dynamic Microphone is designed for podcasters and content creators on a budget, leveraging Audio-Technica’s experience in creating studio and stage microphones. It features a large-diaphragm dynamic capsule in an end-address configuration, similar to traditional broadcast microphones. The AT2040 is designed to deliver a warm vocal tone while minimizing background noise and room reflections, thanks to its hypercardioid polar pattern.

The AT2040 includes an internal multistage pop filter to reduce vocal plosives and an integrated shockmount to prevent noise from stand handling and vibrations. It has an XLR 3-pin output connector and low sensitivity, requiring use with a mic preamp capable of moderate to high gain.

Maono PD100 Microphone Overview

The Maono PD100 microphone is designed for broadcasting, featuring a built-in dynamic core and an inner double layer pop filter. It incorporates noise isolation technology to reduce plosives, aiming to produce clear and clean audio output. The microphone offers a frequency response range of 60-14kHz, aiming for a balanced audio reproduction that is clean and mellow.

From a design perspective, the PD100 is tailored for home studio use. It features a cardioid pattern and an “End Address” pick-up style, designed to capture voice details. The XLR Podcast microphone has an all-metal construction and comes with a 2.36-inch detachable mic stand, which is adjustable up to 180°. This design is intended to provide flexibility in adjusting the microphone angle to suit different recording needs.

AT2040 vs PD100 Specs

Audio Technica AT2040
Maono PD100
Polar Pattern
Address Type
Frequency Response
80-16,000 Hz
-53 dB
-53dB ± 3dB
132 dB Spl
615 g (1.35 lbs)
322g (11.4oz)

AT2040 vs PD100 Frequency Response

Audio Technica AT2040 Frequency Response Chart
Audio Technica AT2040 Frequency Response Chart
Maono PD100 Frequency Response Chart
Maono PD100 Frequency Response Chart

AT2040 vs PD100 Comparison

When we compared two microphones, the Audio Technica AT2040 and the Maono PD100, we liked the Maono PD100 better. The PD100 had a nicer sound overall and was better at keeping out background noises, which is really helpful when recording. The AT2040, on the other hand, had too much of a middle-range sound, which didn’t seem as good to us as the sound from the PD100.

AT2040 vs PD100 Pricing

AT2040 vs PD100 Topics

  • 0:00 – Introduction
  • 0:23 – Equipment Setup
  • 1:16 – Microphone Pricing
  • 1:42 – Looks / First Impressions
  • 2:43 – Microphone Mounting
  • 3:19 – Microphone Specs
  • 4:22 – Frequency Response
  • 5:56 – Plosive Test
  • 6:26 – Proximity Test
  • 7:02 – Background Noise Test
  • 7:39 – Off Axis Noise Rejection Test
  • 8:02 – Handling Noise Test
  • 8:22 – Tap Test
  • 8:39 – Audio Processing Test (Eq, Compression, etc.)
  • 9:13 – Blind Test
  • 9:45 – Overall Thoughts
  • 12:30 – Final Thoughts